<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Evolve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dmevolve.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dmevolve.com</link>
	<description>Macintosh IT Consulting from the Silicon Prairie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:20:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mountain Lion announced by Apple drops the word &#8216;Mac&#8217;, blesses Twitter again in Mountain Lion &#171; iDigiD</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2012/02/mountain-lion-announced/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple drops the word &#8216;Mac&#8217;, blesses Twitter again in Mountain Lion &#171; iDigiD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.com/?p=439#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Mountain Lion announced (dmevolve.com) [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (74.200.244.78) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (74.200.243.251) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mountain Lion announced (dmevolve.com) [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (74.200.244.78) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (74.200.243.251) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinc Iowa by Thinc Iowa a Rousing Success &#124; NotifyWorks</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/10/thinc-iowa/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinc Iowa a Rousing Success &#124; NotifyWorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.com/?p=397#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] Thinc Iowa (dmevolve.com)        This entry was posted in Legal Marketing by Rush Nigut. Bookmark the permalink. [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (64.13.250.69) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (64.13.254.212) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thinc Iowa (dmevolve.com)        This entry was posted in Legal Marketing by Rush Nigut. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (64.13.250.69) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (64.13.254.212) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinc Iowa by - desmoinesisnotboring.com</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/10/thinc-iowa/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>- desmoinesisnotboring.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.com/?p=397#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] Thinc Iowa (dmevolve.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thinc Iowa (dmevolve.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Remembering Steve &#8211; Part 3 by Jon Thompson</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/10/remembering-steve-part-3/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 06:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.wordpress.com/?p=382#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s articles about Steve from my friends in the Des Moines Community. Feel free to comment with your own.

Tim Johnson - http://carpefactum.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/10/jobs-stimulus-package.html
Romelle Slaughter - http://civilityisnotdead.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/innovation-never-stops-steve-jobs-1955-2011/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s articles about Steve from my friends in the Des Moines Community. Feel free to comment with your own.</p>
<p>Tim Johnson &#8211; <a href="http://carpefactum.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/10/jobs-stimulus-package.html" rel="nofollow">http://carpefactum.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/10/jobs-stimulus-package.html</a><br />
Romelle Slaughter &#8211; <a href="http://civilityisnotdead.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/innovation-never-stops-steve-jobs-1955-2011/" rel="nofollow">http://civilityisnotdead.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/innovation-never-stops-steve-jobs-1955-2011/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Two days with a Lion. by Two days with a Lion redux &#124;</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/07/two-days-with-a-lion/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Two days with a Lion redux &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-5</guid>
		<description>[...] Post navigation &#8592; Previous [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Post navigation &larr; Previous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple and the Enterprise by Jon Thompson</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/04/apple-and-the-enterprise/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-4</guid>
		<description>The XServe had the redundant power supplies from 2006 on and hardware raid from 2007 on. I realize that this is now obsolete, but I wanted to point out that Apple did implement the technologies in their enterprise product line.

However, my argument is that things like hardware RAID and dual power supplies are really less necessary and can actually be detrimental in today&#039;s world of &quot;green&quot; datacenters. I know of enterprise systems that have eliminated RAID arrays by moving to SSDs, which drastically increases performance at the same time. Since the SSD has redundancy built in, and there isn&#039;t a 75 Mph spinning component to fail, the MTBF is drastically lower. When you look at Facebook&#039;s Open Compute platform, the power supplies are not redundant, nor are they at Google from what I understand. They just duplicate the entire machine into an active-active spare. Looking at the Open Compute platform again, there is no mention of hardware RAID support on the logic board, despite having six SATA ports. My guess is that the data is, once again, spread between machines, rather than drives. A query to a colleague who works at the Oregon Facebook datacenter responded that they are implementing software RAID, which I interpret as being a software implementation, and the power supply supports two inputs- normal AC and a DC input from a battery backup, not redundancy power sources.

I do understand that the memory in a Mac Mini is much more constrained than in any of the products on the market today, including the Facebook specification (480 GB) and the HP specification (48 GB). Assuming that what I wrote is true, it&#039;ll be interesting to see how Apple deals with that. At one point, I said that I wouldn&#039;t ever recommend a Mac with less that 4 GB of RAM. Then, the SSD-based Macbook Air came out, and the latency introduced with Virtual Memory pages was considerably improved.

In no way am I suggesting that you&#039;ll get datacenter tips from the Genius Bar. What I am suggesting is that Apple will have the stock available to be able to have something to you as quickly as what you say you can have from Dell, since it is stocked at your nearest Apple Store. They&#039;ll also leverage the fact that the equipment going into the data center is the same as going into small to medium business, and will be able to provide it at a price that cannot be ignored.

The articles I&#039;ve read about Unisys hardening iOS devices for government use has me thinking that they, like many companies, have different divisions for different purposes, and from what you say, the menial tasks division is vastly popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The XServe had the redundant power supplies from 2006 on and hardware raid from 2007 on. I realize that this is now obsolete, but I wanted to point out that Apple did implement the technologies in their enterprise product line.</p>
<p>However, my argument is that things like hardware RAID and dual power supplies are really less necessary and can actually be detrimental in today&#8217;s world of &#8220;green&#8221; datacenters. I know of enterprise systems that have eliminated RAID arrays by moving to SSDs, which drastically increases performance at the same time. Since the SSD has redundancy built in, and there isn&#8217;t a 75 Mph spinning component to fail, the MTBF is drastically lower. When you look at Facebook&#8217;s Open Compute platform, the power supplies are not redundant, nor are they at Google from what I understand. They just duplicate the entire machine into an active-active spare. Looking at the Open Compute platform again, there is no mention of hardware RAID support on the logic board, despite having six SATA ports. My guess is that the data is, once again, spread between machines, rather than drives. A query to a colleague who works at the Oregon Facebook datacenter responded that they are implementing software RAID, which I interpret as being a software implementation, and the power supply supports two inputs- normal AC and a DC input from a battery backup, not redundancy power sources.</p>
<p>I do understand that the memory in a Mac Mini is much more constrained than in any of the products on the market today, including the Facebook specification (480 GB) and the HP specification (48 GB). Assuming that what I wrote is true, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see how Apple deals with that. At one point, I said that I wouldn&#8217;t ever recommend a Mac with less that 4 GB of RAM. Then, the SSD-based Macbook Air came out, and the latency introduced with Virtual Memory pages was considerably improved.</p>
<p>In no way am I suggesting that you&#8217;ll get datacenter tips from the Genius Bar. What I am suggesting is that Apple will have the stock available to be able to have something to you as quickly as what you say you can have from Dell, since it is stocked at your nearest Apple Store. They&#8217;ll also leverage the fact that the equipment going into the data center is the same as going into small to medium business, and will be able to provide it at a price that cannot be ignored.</p>
<p>The articles I&#8217;ve read about Unisys hardening iOS devices for government use has me thinking that they, like many companies, have different divisions for different purposes, and from what you say, the menial tasks division is vastly popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple and the Enterprise by djweis</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/04/apple-and-the-enterprise/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>djweis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I disagree that Apple is going to make any Enterprise moves, or at least any successful ones. The knowledge to compete in the enterprise hardware market has long since left the building. Delivering a server with no hardware RAID as a factory option as well as no redundant or swappable power supplies wasn&#039;t a very good choice when that was standard in the PC and Unix world for over a decade. The warranty and parts for the XServe were equally bad. If you wanted spares, you would pay $1k+ for a kit of parts to stock yourself. With Dell or HP, I could have FedEx get any replacement part in the box onsite in less than 4 hours with a tech on the way at the same time. 

Back to the possible improvements on the Mini, it would require increasing the size and power consumption. There&#039;s very little use for a virtualization platform that maxes out at 4 or 8 gigs of RAM. The current state of the art is 32+ gigs in a single box with dozens of cores, all of which is hot swappable and doesn&#039;t require a trip to the mall to ask the iPhone/iPod salesperson for datacenter tips.

I think there is less &#039;esteem&#039; for Unisys among the people that encounter them on a regular basis. They are more accurately viewed as the least expensive nationwide collection of moderately trained techs that can take directions over the phone and accurately fill out a return shipping label. Yes, they work in data centers, but swapping hard drives and other menial tasks that the customer doesn&#039;t want to do themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that Apple is going to make any Enterprise moves, or at least any successful ones. The knowledge to compete in the enterprise hardware market has long since left the building. Delivering a server with no hardware RAID as a factory option as well as no redundant or swappable power supplies wasn&#8217;t a very good choice when that was standard in the PC and Unix world for over a decade. The warranty and parts for the XServe were equally bad. If you wanted spares, you would pay $1k+ for a kit of parts to stock yourself. With Dell or HP, I could have FedEx get any replacement part in the box onsite in less than 4 hours with a tech on the way at the same time. </p>
<p>Back to the possible improvements on the Mini, it would require increasing the size and power consumption. There&#8217;s very little use for a virtualization platform that maxes out at 4 or 8 gigs of RAM. The current state of the art is 32+ gigs in a single box with dozens of cores, all of which is hot swappable and doesn&#8217;t require a trip to the mall to ask the iPhone/iPod salesperson for datacenter tips.</p>
<p>I think there is less &#8216;esteem&#8217; for Unisys among the people that encounter them on a regular basis. They are more accurately viewed as the least expensive nationwide collection of moderately trained techs that can take directions over the phone and accurately fill out a return shipping label. Yes, they work in data centers, but swapping hard drives and other menial tasks that the customer doesn&#8217;t want to do themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple and the Enterprise by Apple and the Enterprise (via ) &#124; Chicago Mac/PC Support</title>
		<link>http://dmevolve.com/2011/04/apple-and-the-enterprise/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple and the Enterprise (via ) &#124; Chicago Mac/PC Support</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmevolve.wordpress.com/?p=246#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] So I&#039;ve had this thought for some time now, and have shared it with a few people here and there. Before I start getting deep into speculation, I want to lay down some facts: Oct 2010 &#8211; Apple outsources Enterprise sales and support to Unisys. Nov 2010 &#8211; Apple announces the discontinuation of the XServe. At the same time, they release a laughable white paper, referring to the Mac Pro and Mac Mini Server as reasonable replacements. The Mac enterpris &#8230; Read More [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So I&#039;ve had this thought for some time now, and have shared it with a few people here and there. Before I start getting deep into speculation, I want to lay down some facts: Oct 2010 &#8211; Apple outsources Enterprise sales and support to Unisys. Nov 2010 &#8211; Apple announces the discontinuation of the XServe. At the same time, they release a laughable white paper, referring to the Mac Pro and Mac Mini Server as reasonable replacements. The Mac enterpris &#8230; Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

